By Diablo_Mille_R on Tuesday, May 21, 2002 - 06:44 am:

Cameras

There may be a risk that common sense could prevail over stupidity and greed with our politicians. If the rules about only where injuries have happened come in then bye bye cameras!!! 

By Andyjfalco on Tuesday, May 21, 2002 - 03:28 pm:

What's this? What rules? Please tell!  

By Dangerous on Tuesday, May 21, 2002 - 10:32 pm:

Andyjfalco,

Click on the link at the top of DMR's post.
All will be revealed!

Dangerous  

By Hansie on Tuesday, May 21, 2002 - 10:56 pm:

Very good rule!
We want that one to!!

Hansie  

By Rca on Friday, June 14, 2002 - 08:35 am:

Sorry to disappoint. But the rules only affect those cameras controlled by constabularies that keep the revenue from fines. And, if you are caught on a camera that doesn't obey the rules, you still get the fine and the points and the ban etc., but the police (if you contest it) won't get the money for that particular offence.  

By Scotty on Sunday, June 16, 2002 - 02:52 pm:

Most of the cameras I pass in and around London have now been 'Yellowed' i.e. made high visability.

Trouble was I already knew that they were there!